INTRODUCTION: Justice Antonin Scalia On March 17B18, 2003, The University of Toledo College of Law was honored to have Justice Antonin Scalia as our guest. In addition to his public presentation, Justice Scalia graciously held a question and answer teaching session for students and faculty, and attended a private reception with Law Review students. Justice Scalia's visit enabled us to gain a better understanding of his straightforward, common-sense approach to the law and also his infectious sense of humor. Justice Scalia remained with us after his visit, as professors focused on his opinions in class, or posed questions such as, "What do you think Justice Scalia would say?" Although many students and professors in the law school may disagree with Justice Scalia's textualist view, his visit made a valuable contribution to broadening our legal education.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LAW REVIEW Volume 34 Number 3 Spring 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES Not Mere Rhetoric: On Wasting or Claiming Your Legacy, Justice Scalia Marie A. Failinger............................................................................... 425 Justice Scalia's Tax Jurisprudence Stephen T. Black and Katherine D. Black........................................... 509 Justice Scalia's Influence on Criminal Justice Christopher E. Smith and Madhavi McCall......................................... 535 Scalia and the Institutional Approach to Law Tony Cole............................................................................................ 559 COMMENTS Justice Scalia's Methodological Approach to Judicial Decision-Making: Political Actor or Strategic Institutionalist? Shawn Burton...................................................................................... 575 Breaking Scalia's Silence: The Dissent Justice Scalia Might Have Written in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Kristi Kress Wilhelmy........................................................................... 611 NOTE The Case for a More Workable Standard in Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Atkins v. Virginia and Categorical Exemptions under the Imprudent "Evolving Standards of Decency" Doctrine
|